HP : How HP Takes Advantage of Business Disasters

HP : How HP Takes Advantage of Business Disasters

What would you do if your supply chain was destroyed, one of your biggest competitors tried to push an acquisition, and your cash cow company disintegrated nearly immediately?

In the early 2020s, HP experienced precisely this. By all rights, the business ought to have failed. The printing sector as a whole shrank 9.4%, and HP's prospective acquisition, Xerox, had a more than 60% decline in earnings per share, yet a year later, its revenue and earnings are stable (EPS). Why did HP succeed when others failed?

The solution is in HP's preparation for rogue waves. When many unusual natural events meet, a large wave known as a rogue wave appears seemingly out of nowhere. Large ships are frequently sunk by rogue waves in the deep ocean. They obliterate growth and risk-reduction strategies in company.

Rogue waves are frequently discounted as unlikely by leaders. The cumulative likelihood of implausible events, however, is actually fairly large. Major shocks are actually rather common due to geopolitical conflicts, health crises, social movements, technology advancements, and countless other variables. In actuality, American businesses experienced four shocks on average a year throughout the 20th century. These shocks can produce rogue waves when they collide in the correct way, and as the globe gets more linked and complex, this will happen more frequently.

HP's success in 2020 can be attributed in large part to its long-standing recognition of the dangers (and opportunities) posed by rogue waves and its deliberate, proactive approach to utilizing them. I was directly involved in the company's strategy for resilient growth as the former Global Futurist and Director of Long-Term Research for HP. Since leaving HP, I've also carried out a thorough literature review on the subject that served as the basis for my book on the best practices for spotting, surviving, and taking advantage of radical change. Based on this research, I've created a three-step framework to explain how any company may not only survive the next rogue wave, but also benefit from it.

The Basic Building Blocks of Resilient Growth

Convincing people that rogue waves exist is the first step in preparing for them. A business won't adapt if it doesn't understand why it must.

At HP, we set up a small team called the "Future Unit" to keep an eye on social, economic, and technological trends that might have the potential to coalesce into rogue waves in order to raise awareness of potential hazards and opportunities. People with expertise in a wide range of subjects, such as social science, policy, economics, technology, and more, made up this core team. They were urged to do as broad a range of research as they could.

The growing probability of a pandemic was one potential concern that this study discovered. Aging demographics, foreign travel, and rising urban densities all showed that the threat had been growing long before the first Covid-19 cases were discovered.

Of fact, a comprehensive risk assessment doesn't typically correspond well to the immediate priorities or goals of any one team. In order to address this, we established procedures to ensure that these insights were communicated throughout the business so that everyone was aware of potential difficulties in the future. In order to make sure that long-term strategy decisions were supported by a thorough, current study of dangers and possibilities, the Future Unit periodically briefed the C-Suite and board. In addition, we created a bigger cross-functional, international group with regional managers, representatives from HR, finance, legal, facilities, sales, and customer support. This group not only added a local, on-the-ground viewpoint to the Future Unit's higher-level study but also assisted the Future Unit in effectively distributing important information throughout the organization.

Behavior

After putting in place a system for maintaining awareness, HP's next step was to make sure that everyone in the organization had the authority to take advantage of a rogue wave if and when it materialized. To do this, important behaviors had to be modified in order to be more responsive to the trends we had discovered.

In order to do this, the Future Unit actively educated key decision-makers to take these elements into account while formulating global trade strategies, designing sales channels, and making investments in technologies, competences, and assets. For instance, studies from the Future Unit motivated HP to invest in modifying inkjet printer technology for medical applications like medication development, vaccine research, and quick diagnostic testing years before the coronavirus pandemic started.

Although HP lacked a crystal ball, it was prepared to seize the opportunity presented by pandemics since it had identified them as one of a number of potential risks. HP immediately redirected its resources to focus more on work-from-home goods and the health care technology it already had in development after the coronavirus pandemic devastated its main market for office equipment.

Culture

Of course, altering hearts and minds is necessary before altering behaviors. A culture of open communication, transparent procedures, and a proper ratio of hierarchy to independence were all necessary for carrying out the aforementioned initiatives in an efficient manner. Our organization gave priority to rules that let various teams work together on high-level objectives while still acting independently on lower-level ones. Junior staff members were given permission to communicate their opinions and suggestions to senior leadership.

In the end, it all came down to creating a psychologically comfortable environment for our staff, but HP also used some tactical techniques like:

• establishing trustworthy, organized teams with distinct tasks and responsibilities for each employee while working with HR and management.

• reducing the time and costs involved with implementing new ideas by flattening management structures.

• establishing and disseminating "risk bands," or the maximum and minimum amounts of risk that employees should accept.

• assisting them in developing their communication skills, ensuring sure they were supported even when they made mistakes, and encouraging junior staff to participate in and run meetings with senior executives.

• Teams might be encouraged to concentrate on long-term goals by implementing incentives like official bonuses and applauding workers in front of their colleagues.

Read More

Artificial intelligence : The cybersecurity arms race and how AI is influencing it

Artificial intelligence

The cybersecurity arms race and how AI is influencing it

The average firm utilizes a variety of software tools to monitor for intruders, malware, and other dangers, and these systems generate 10,000 warnings every day. The data that cybersecurity employees must filter through to manage their cyber defenses frequently overwhelms them.

The odds are against us. Millions of people and thousands of organizations in the United States alone are being impacted by an increase in cyberattacks.

These difficulties highlight the need for more effective strategies to halt the rise of cyber-breaches. Finding patterns in vast amounts of data is a task that artificial intelligence is especially well equipped for. As a researcher who focuses on cybersecurity and AI, I observe that AI is quickly becoming a crucial tool in cybersecurity.

Helping people

There are primarily two ways that AI is enhancing cybersecurity. First off, AI may assist in automating a variety of duties that a human analyst would typically undertake manually. Unknown workstations, servers, code repositories, and other pieces of hardware and software on a network can all be automatically detected as part of this. It can also decide how to effectively distribute security measures. These are tasks that require a lot of data, and AI has the potential to process terabytes of data in a way that is far more productive and efficient than a person ever could.

Second, AI has the ability to find patterns in massive amounts of data that human analysts are unable to. AI, for instance, may identify the crucial linguistic patterns used by hackers to upload new risks on the dark web and notify experts.

More particular, AI-enabled analytics can assist in deciphering the slang and code words that hackers use to describe their new instruments, methods, and approaches. One illustration is calling a botnet by its name, Mirai. The name was created by hackers to obscure the botnet subject from specialists in law enforcement and cyberthreat intelligence.

In cybersecurity, AI has already seen some early triumphs. Companies like FireEye, Microsoft, and Google are increasingly creating cutting-edge AI methods to find malware, stop phishing scams, and keep track of the spread of misinformation. Microsoft's Cyber Signals initiative, which employs artificial intelligence to monitor 24 trillion security signals, 40 nation-state groups, and 140 hacker groups to create cyberthreat intelligence for C-level executives, is one notable result.

The Department of Defense and the National Science Foundation, two federal funding organizations, have invested tens of millions of dollars to develop sophisticated AI tools for extracting insights from data generated by the dark web and open-source software platforms like GitHub, a global software development code repository where hackers can share code as well. These organizations also recognize the potential of AI for cybersecurity.

Issues with AI

Security experts are unsure of AI's place despite the technology's enormous benefits for cybersecurity. Companies may be considering using AI systems to replace their human analysts, but they may be unsure of how much they can rely on these machines. Additionally, it is unclear whether and how cybersecurity systems built on AI will be affected by the well-known AI issues of bias, fairness, transparency, and ethics.

Additionally, malevolent hackers can benefit from AI as well as cybersecurity experts working to stem the flood of intrusions. Attackers are developing new kinds of cyberattacks that can elude cyber defenses by employing techniques like reinforcement learning and generative adversarial networks, which build new information or software based on a small sample size.

Researchers and experts in cybersecurity are continuously discovering all the different ways that hostile hackers are utilizing AI.

The future route

There is a lot of potential for AI in cybersecurity going forward. Analysts will be able to respond to new risks thanks in part to the predictions made by AI systems based on the patterns they find. AI is a fascinating tool that, with careful development, might become a necessary tool for the upcoming generation of cybersecurity professionals and help slow the flood of intrusions.

But given how quickly AI is developing, completely automated cyberwars between AI attackers and AI defenders are probably still years away.

Read More

Artificial intelligence: Uses for it

 Artificial intelligence: Uses for it

Artificial intelligence, sometimes referred to as artificial intelligence (AI), is a growing branch of science. AI is a science that, technically speaking, includes a number of technologies that are motivated by human thought, perception, behavior, and decision-making. AI is simply technology with artificial intelligence created by humans to assist them.

According to a Stanford University research covering the next 100 years, AI will continue to advance quickly and transform society through the year 2030. China's Jack Ma, a billionaire, discussed the significance of AI in his most recent speech in April 2017.

Products built on AI technology are becoming more and more popular. A automobile with automated control is one that is now popular. How the major corporation Amazon created the automated payment system is equally well-known. Customers can enter the Amazon Go supermarket without waiting in line or dealing with cashiers because everything is handled automatically. It will open in the middle of 2017.

The auto-debit function used by the Bank to make payments is an illustration of a straightforward AI application that is well-known. The Bank will automatically withdraw money from the customer's account each month as a method to take the position of a Teller in the Bank for Dutch students who typically rent a home. In the Netherlands, it is uncommon to see tellers get up to greet customers because practically all of their information systems are already computerized (AI applications in banking).

A real-time translator tool called Babel Fish is an AI program that is also very useful for human communication. To go to any country, we simply need to insert this device into our ears. Even if we don't understand the language being used, we may quickly understand what others are saying to us thanks to this tool.

If AI provides so many advantages for people, could it also pose risks? The response is "Yes." AI is intelligence based on human intelligence. Therefore, AI has the potential to mimic every aspect of human behavior and even completely replace humans.

The number of front-line employees in banking has been reduced thanks to AI technologies. Robotic automation and other AI uses in industry have also helped to cut back on the workforce. Amazon's automated retail program visibly cuts down on staff and, in some cases, runs entirely without them. Therefore, it is not improbable that in the future, AI would actually make occupations harder.

The danger that AI technology poses has been extensively debated by professionals in the industry. Researchers from throughout the globe have also realized this. Business leaders are also aware that AI has two distinct benefits and drawbacks. On the one hand, it can expedite operations, but on the other, it can limit humankind's ability to benefit from its empowerment.

A challenge is also the effect of AI on the public and the law. How self-driving cars, drones, robots displacing workers, and other automated systems should be governed by rules and policies in order to maintain order and reap numerous benefits in the social, economic, and cultural spheres.

Many experts in this subject concur that the development of AI is primarily focused on tasks that humans are unable to perform. For instance, human workers cannot perform welding and painting operations in the manufacturing sector of the automobile industry because they are hazardous to their safety and health; instead, machines and robots are taking their place. Such advancements in artificial intelligence must and should always be supported.

Indonesia, a sizable country that is still growing, needs to be conscious of how AI may affect society in the future.

Although our nation is behind in the development of technology, Indonesia does not lack for skilled labor. To further advance the welfare of the community, good links between the fields of research, education, economics, and industry must be supported.

Read More

The Law

Definition of Indonesian Criminal Law

 

Definition 

There are various kinds of law in Indonesia itself depending on the basis of the division.

But in general, Indonesian law can be divided into two categories: public law and private law.

Public law is the legal framework that governs how each individual interacts with the state. This comprehensive law is applicable to all citizens.

Private law is the contrary, though. This law governs how people interact with one another and takes individual preferences into account.

Most legal experts agree that because it governs how citizens, society, and the state interact, criminal law is a sort of legislation that belongs in public law.

However, there are still laws governing private criminal law that, in this instance, the state cannot immediately pursue without a request from the harmed party.

There are many professionals with opinions on criminal law.

Prior to this, you should be aware that the definition of law in general has not yet reached a threshold of comprehension.

Law has many facets, making it impossible to define from just one angle.

Nevertheless, there are several restrictions that, in the case of criminal law, can define the law.

Derkje Hazewinkel-Suringa, a Dutch author, claims that there are a number of restrictions that can define criminal law, including:

1. There exist directives and prohibitions, and certain governmental institutions have established the prospect of consequences in the event that they are broken.

2. There are regulations that specify the actions the state may take against persons who disobey these regulations.

3. Its scope is governed by laws that apply to a particular country's territory at a specific moment.

Understanding Criminal Law from Professionals

Formed by lawmakers, W.L.G. Lemaire defined criminal law as a set of norms with imperatives and prohibitions that have a penalty in the shape of punishment in the form of particular suffering.

Mezger provides a clearer definition of criminal law, stating that it is a set of laws that impose penalties for certain acts that fall under specific conditions.

Moeljatno stated it very plainly in his writings, stating that criminal law can be viewed as a component of the general legal system that governs a nation, as well as all the fundamental laws and rules pertaining to what is and is not permitted, as well as prohibitions and criminal penalties for violators.

In addition, the rules specify when and under what circumstances violators may face penalties as well as how criminal fines may be imposed.

In light of the aforementioned definitions and the summary of the criminal code,

"Specifically, the law that governs the community's instructions and restrictions in their civic activities imposed by recognized official institutions and imposes severe penalties on those who break them."

Read More

Argentina's version of the Kanjuruhan tragedy sees a football fan killed by tear gas fired by the police (Football Argentina)

 Tragic events from the Kanjuruhan incident were reenacted in Argentina by soccer fans throughout the world. This week, the incident happened in the Argentine League.

The deaths of at least 131 persons at the Kanjuruhan Stadium following the Arema FC vs. Persebaya Surabaya match have focused the attention of the entire globe on Malang at the moment. Things that are said to have occurred during the Argentine League match between Gimnasia La Plata and Boca Juniors on October 6, 2022, at the Estadio Juan Carmelo Zerillo.

Outside of the stadium is where the incident began. Many spectators still hadn't entered the stadium at that point. The gate, though, had already been shut.

After the event, cops began using tear gas and rubber bullets, which generated a ruckus. Unfortunately, the incident escalated and reached the stadium. Nevertheless, the game has already begun.

The game was suspended as it reached the eighth minute. because the stadium started to be filled with tear gas. The athletes entered the dressing room right away. While others in the stadium's audience made an effort to save themselves.

Many onlookers started to enter the field as a result. They searched for a free place because of the state of the closed door, and the field the players had vacated was an alternative.

Tragically, one observer is the one who suffers the consequences. He was discovered to have had a heart attack before passing away while en route to the hospital.

This incident took place not too long after the one at the Kanjuruhan Stadium. In actuality, 131 people have died as a result of this catastrophe, making it one of the bloodiest in football's long history.

Read More

examining how the FIFA regulations were implemented during the Kanjuruhan tragedy

Kanjuruhan Tragedy : Aremania

A human life is not worth a football. This statement was made following the encounter between Arema FC and Persebaya Surabaya on October 1 at the Kanjuruhan Stadium in Malang, East Java.

The Kanjuruhan disaster left a lasting impression on the world and Indonesian football history, causing tremendous sorrow.

More than one hundred people died. This tragic occurrence took place as Indonesian football was being developed, which makes it all the more tragic.

In addition, President Joko Widodo has directed the Ministry of Youth and Sports, the National Police, and PSSI to thoroughly assess whether Liga 1 should be temporarily suspended until security protocols are assessed and improved.

The Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal, and Security Affairs (Menkopolhukam) Mahfud MD led the government in promptly establishing an Independent Joint Fact Finding Team (TGIPF).

The Kanjuruhan catastrophe is in the news due to the large number of victims that perished; 125 individuals were declared deceased. Then, what went wrong, and what can be inferred from this awful occurrence?

FIFA has regulations through the FIFA Stadium Safety and Security Regulations that apply to a football match.

The rules, which total 112 pages, provide a detailed explanation of the factors that must be taken into account while organizing football games.

These regulations are also mentioned in the BRI Liga 1 tournament rules for 2022–2023. Concerning security and comfort, see Article 4. specifically Point 4 which states:

The host club is responsible for ensuring that all venues where guest clubs and game equipment will be used are secure (including stadiums and hotels). Security plans that incorporate statements from parties linked to the scope are also made by the host club. This plan has been created with consideration for the PSSI regulations and appropriate FIFA stadium security and security regulations.

It is explicitly stated in the FIFA Stadium Safety and Security Regulations what must be done when staging a match.

There are laws that regulate things even before the game starts, and they can serve as a solid foundation.

Take Article 6 of the stadium safety and security plans, for instance. Then, in the following piece, the measures that stadium security officers must perform are once more detailed.

All parties involved, such as the executive committee, the police, the emergency (emergency) team, and others, are represented among the stadium security guards.

According to the FIFA Stadium Safety and Security Regulations, they each have their own responsibilities, authority, and capabilities.

Security personnel at stadiums must manage risk by considering all scenarios that could occur during a game.

The risk analysis must take into account a variety of factors. Article 7 Point 3 (a) "Historical hostility between clubs or their fans" is one of the points made there.

In other words, the planners must consider the background of the opposing teams and fans.

The two opposing teams in the Kanjuruhan Tragedy are Arema FC and Persebaya Surabaya, who have a long-standing rivalry. including devotees of both Aremania and Bonek.

In this instance, the organizers must have recognized the situation and acted appropriately by forbidding Bonek from visiting the Kanjuruhan Stadium.

However, does it end there? Obviously not. Security personnel must also be able to predict what will happen whether the home side wins or loses.

Arema lost the game at Kanjuruhan last week by a score of 2-3 in front of tens of thousands of their supporters.

Aremania experienced disappointment at that moment. The Kanjuruhan Tragedy started when they took their frustrations out on the field.

Security guards must to be able to forecast and anticipate from here. Of course, with a risk analysis that was completed well in advance of the game.

According to the study that was previously described, there will be efforts to mitigate or lower risk by putting in place suitable security measures. The stadium contingency plans are mentioned in Article 9.

Crowd control is discussed in point 2(e) in terms of stadium turmoil, crowding in the stadium, ticket fraud and illicit ticket sales, emergency evacuations, etc.

Then there is Article 10 about the emergency plans for stadiums. The FIFA Stadium Safety and Security Regulations lay out every item in great detail.

Tear Gas

Tear gas, which is categorically forbidden by FIFA rules, is the main indicator of life loss in the Kanjuruhan Tragedy.

It is forbidden to possess or use weapons or "Crowd Control Gas," according to Article 19(b).

Of course, there is a justification for this restriction. Tear gas was used in the Kanjuruhan incident, and as a result of the audience's fright, anarchy was inescapable.

Watching football is not the same as going to a stadium or rioting. The crowd must have been screened from the moment it entered the stadium. It is important to be aware of this.

The use of tear gas at football games cannot be justified, however it's possible that in Kanjuruhan the security forces had other things they needed to accomplish.

Several groups claimed that the security forces' conduct of the fan unrest at the Kanjuruhan Stadium was disproportionate.

There may not have been any fatalities if the tear gas shots had not been fired.

Additionally, it should be recalled that in the Kanjuruhan Stadium, there were just home supporters—no Bonek—because visiting Malang was prohibited from the start in order to prevent confrontations.

Just use a water cannon (watercanon), which has a lower danger of injury, to drive away supporters. Or there must be parked fire vehicles at the stadium that can be utilized to spray water on the spectators.

The presence of fire engines in the stadium during a game is required under FIFA regulations.

There is also a description of crowd control in the FIFA Stadium Safety and Security Regulations, which should have security plans and methods to prepare for the worst-case scenario.

Thorough Assessment

Nobody wants the Kanjuruhan Tragedy to happen again. Therefore, in accordance with President Jokowi's instructions, a thorough review is required.

Everything in organizing matches is standard, as was stated at the outset, and sound planning is required. Put prevention before action.

On the other hand, it is also essential to educate everyone engaged, including the security forces and sympathizers.

The committee must have requested authorization to host the match from the beginning. There must be a grace period in the licensing procedure before the match's D day.

The police, who serve as the security intelligence in this scenario, are able to design preparations that adhere to FIFA regulations.

Certainly, the cops have very detailed processes. It just comes down to how to balance their impressions of the committee's needs, the demands of the circumstance, and the necessity of maintaining security.

Coordination allows for the equivalence of perception. To prepare for unfavorable circumstances, print out a stadium layout map and analyze it with your group.

Like when boarding an aircraft or viewing a movie, stadium visitors receive a safety briefing prior to the game. This is done so that supporters will know where to go in the event of an emergency.

Again, the FIFA Stadium Safety and Security Regulations are comprehensive and in-depth, and they include topics like stadium eligibility and others.

These ideal methods do, in fact, necessitate work, socialization, and most significantly, a shared perception of all parties from the implementing committee and the public security.

However, everything must be done to ensure everyone's safety. The Kanjuruhan tragedy taught us a valuable lesson. Keep it from happening again.

In handling this catastrophe, all parties must act responsibly. Let's do it properly.

Read More

President: Conduct a thorough investigation and impose sanctions for the Kanjuruhan tragedy (INDONESIA, Malang, Stadion kanjuruhan)

The incident that occurred on Saturday, October 1, 2022, in Stadion Kanjuruhan, Kabupaten Malang, Province of Jawa Timur, is to be thoroughly investigated. Additionally, the President stated that organizations that have recently been breached must receive sanksi.

President Jokowi said in a media briefing on October 3, 2022, in the Batang Integrated Industrial Estate (KITB), Batang Regency, Central Java Province, "I have said, it is thoroughly investigated, sanctions are given to those who are guilty."

The president has requested help from each and every one of his or his advisors to solve this particular tragedy. The speaker said, "I also think my orders are clear to the Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs, to the National Police Chief, to the Menpora and everything is clear."

Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs (Menko Polhukam) Mahfud Md. stated that the government had enlisted the help of the Joint Team of Independent Facts Seekers (TGIPF) to fully disclose the Kanjuruhan tragedy. This team will be led by the Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs, whose membership will be determined in the next 24 hours.

The Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs clarifies that the target audience for this time will be the officials/representatives of the relevant ministries, as well as observers, academics, and mass media organizations. "Soon, things will get underway. It will be possible to resolve this in two to four days from now," he said.

Further, Mahfud stated that the government has requested Polri to immediately apprehend any suspects who were in possession of tinnitus within a few days. Additionally, the police are mandated to conduct an evaluation of the security of the implementation in the holy land.

Read More